Tuesday, November 30, 2010

Story of Appreciation

One young academically excellent person went to apply for a managerial
position in a big company.
He passed the first interview, the director did the last interview, made
the last decision.
The director discovered from the CV, that the youth's academic result was
excellent all the way, from the secondary school until the postgraduate
research, never was there a year he did not score.

The director asked, "Did you obtain any scholarship in school?" and the youth
answered "no".
The director asked, " Did your father pay your school fees?". The youth
answered, "my father passed away when I was one year old and it was my mother
who paid my school fees".
The director asked, " Where did your mother work?" the youth answered, "my
mother worked as cloth cleaner." The director requested the youth to show his
hands and the youth showed a pair of hands that was smooth and perfect to the
director.
The director asked, " Did you ever help your mother wash clothes before?" The
youth answered," never, my mother always wanted me to study and read more books,
furthermore, my mother could wash clothes faster than I could"

The director said, I have a request, when you go back today, go and help to
clean your mother's hand, and then see me tomorrow morning.
The youth felt that the chance of landing the job was high and when he went
back, he happily wanted to clean his mother's hands. His mother felt strange.
With happiness mixed with fear, she showed her hands to the kid.
The youth cleaned his mother's hands slowly and his tears fell as he did that.
It was the first time he noticed that his mother's hands were so wrinkled, and
that there were so many bruises in her hands. Some bruises were so painful
that she shuddered when his mother's hands were cleaned with water.
This is the first time that the youth realized and experienced that it is this
pair of hands that washed the clothes everyday to earn him the school fees and
that the bruises in the mother's hand were the price that the mother paid for
his graduation and academic excellence and probably his future.
After finishing the cleaning of his mother's hands, the youth quietly washed
all the remaining clothes for his mother.
That night,the mother and son talked for a very long time.
Next morning, the youth went to the director's office
The director noticed the tear in the youth's eye and asked: " Can you tell
what you did and learnt yesterday in your house?"
The youth answered, " I cleaned my mother's hands and also finished washing all
the remaining clothes'
The director asked, "please tell me whatbyou felt"
The youth said, "Number 1, I know what appreciation is now'. Without my
mother, I would not be successful today. Number 2, now I know how to work
together with my mother. Only now do I realize how difficult and tough it is to
get something done. Number 3, I know the importance and value of family
relationship.
The director said, "This is what I am asking, I want to recruit a person that
can appreciate the help of others, a person who knows the suffering of others to
get things done, and a person that would not put money as his only goal in life
to be my manager. You are hired.
Later on, this young person worked very hard, and received the respect of his
subordinates, every employee worked diligently and as a team and the company
improved tremendously.
A child who has been protected and habitually given whatever he needs, develops
"entitlement mentality" and always puts himself first. He is ignorant of his
parent's efforts. When he starts work, he assumes every person must listen to
him, and when he becomes a manager, he would never know the suffering of his
employees and always blame others. These kinds of people, can achieve good
results and may be successful for a while, but eventually would not feel
a sense of achievement or satisfaction. If we happen to be this kind of
(protective) parent, this is the time to ask the question- whether we did/do
love our kids or destroy them.
You can let your kid live in a big house, eat a good meal, learn to play
the piano, watch a big screen TV but when you are cutting grass, please let them
experienceit. After a meal, let them wash their plate and bowl together with
their brothers and sisters. It is not because you do not have money to hire a
maid, but it is because you want to love and show them the correct way. You
want them to understand that no matter how rich their parent are, one day they
will grow old, become weak and that their hair too will grow grey,. The most
important thing is for your kid to learn how to appreciate, experience and
learn the effort and ability needed to work with others to get things done.
They should also value, appreciate what the parents have done and love them for
who they are!

Thursday, November 25, 2010

SUPRABHAT! A superb story worth sharing

There once lived a great mathematician in a village outside Ujjain . He was
often called by the local king to advice on matters related to the economy. His
reputation had spread as far as Taxila in the North and Kanchi in the South. So
it hurt him very much when the village headman told him, "You may be a great
mathematician who advises the king on economic matters but your son does not
know the value of gold or silver."


The mathematician called his son and asked, "What is more valuable - gold or
silver?" "Gold," said the son. "That is correct. Why is it then that the village
headman makes fun of you, claims you do not know the value of gold or silver? He
teases me every day. He mocks me before other village elders as a father who
neglects his son. This hurts me. I feel everyone in the village is laughing
behind my back because you do not know what is more valuable, gold or silver.
Explain this to me, son."


So the son of the mathematician told his father the reason why the village
headman carried this impression. "Every day on my way to school, the village
headman calls me to his house. There, in front of all village elders, he holds
out a silver coin in one hand and a gold coin in other. He asks me to pick up
the more valuable coin. I pick the silver coin. He laughs, the elders jeer,
everyone makes fun of me. And then I go to school. This happens every day. That
is why they tell you I do not know the value of gold or silver."


The father was confused. His son knew the value of gold and silver, and yet when
asked to choose between a gold coin and silver coin always picked the silver
coin. "Why don't you pick up the gold coin?" he asked. In response, the son took
the father to his room and showed him a box. In the box were at least a hundred
silver coins. Turning to his father, the mathematician' s son said, "The day I
pick up the gold coin the game will stop. They will stop having fun and I will
stop making money."


The bottom line is:

Sometimes in life, we have to play the fool because our seniors and our peers,
and sometimes even our juniors like it.

That does not mean we lose in the game of life. It just means allowing others to
win in one arena of the game,

while we win in the other arena of the game. We have to choose which arena
matters to us and which arenas do not.


"Success Follows Struggle"

ILO Microinsurance Grant

* Posted by Balakrishnan(in www.developmentmatters.ning.com) on November 24,
2010 at 5:07pm

The ILO's Microinsurance Innovation Facility is pleased to announce its fifth
call for proposals. Round 5 focuses on scale and efficiency and is the
Facility's last call for proposals.
Please read first the Application guidelines and form - (pdf 1,69 MB) that
explains the way to apply.
Applications must be submitted online (Online application) at the latest by17:00
Central European Time, 25 January 2011.
If you have questions about the eligibility and selection criteria and the
application process, contact microinsurancegrants@ilo.org.

Wednesday, November 24, 2010

Sensing a Need to Operate Differently

Human Resource Executive Online

This excerpt from "The Corporate Lattice," by Cathy Benko and Molly Anderson,
highlights some of the work Pitney Bowes has done to transform its workforce
operations and culture.

"We're really having to learn how to change our work processes so that you can
have people halfway around the globe working on the same thing," says Mike
Davis, senior vice president of global human resources at General Mills. "Our
global teams are telling us the work process has to change, because if team
members have to wait to check in on every step, they lose a whole day waiting
for replies on check-ins across time zones."

Pitney Bowes has adopted these concepts as the underpinnings of its
transformation from a product company selling postage meters to a solutions
company helping customers manage their "mailstream." For most of its history
(more than one hundred years), the company manufactured and serviced
postage machines.

Its workforce was highly segregated among employees in factories, customer
service, and management. Most factory workers performed a single task in the
line, usually from memory. Their work was repetitive and routine.

By the mid-1990s, newly appointed (and since retired) CEO Mike Critelli has
intensified the company's focus on mailstream management, with greater
investments in technology to produce digital mail machines customized to
customer specifications.

This shift changed the "how" of the company's work, because building and
servicing the new machines involved a high level of interaction with customers
and was technically more complicated than in the past.

The transformation required a fundamental change in the company's operations,
starting at the factory floor and moving all the way to the top. Factory
workers were rearranged into self-directed teams that read blueprints and did
troubleshooting in real time. Factory foremen learned how to be coaches who
inspired teams to perform, no longer relying on a command-and-control approach.
Engineers and the sales force, and eventually even the finance and marketing
departments, switched from a task-based view to a results-driven, team-based
one.

Pitney Bowes is not alone in sensing the need to operate differently. A number
of companies have adopted flexible teams as their basic operating unit.
Companies use cross-functional project teams that form and disband as needed
instead of having tasks move serially from department to department. "As
companies become more global enterprises, careers are increasingly being built
on demonstrating skills at marshaling resources of more temporary teams than
permanent structures," says General Mills' Davis.

Notes Pfizer's Tanya Clemons, "It stands to reason that being continually
adaptive in response to the ever-changing marketplace requires three things:
more autonomy on the part of the individual, greater global collaboration among
virtual team members, and a vast proliferation of project-based work."

Indeed, the average number of projects has increased fortyfold in the past two
decades. The United States had almost 8 million project workers in 2006, with
1.2 million net job openings in project-based industries likely each year until
2016.

To put it in monetary terms, the Project Management Institute estimates that
approximately one-fifth of global GDP spending, or about $12 trillion, is now
spent on fixed-capital projects such as power plants and factories.

For most of the twentieth century, companies were organized in either
functional silos or individual business units (or both). As an early sign of
the emerging lattice, starting in the 1970s companies began to adopt a matrix
organizational structure to increase information sharing and speed the
assignment of resources to new areas.

In contrast to a functional organization, where an employee has one manager and
is a member of one department like sales or production, employees in a matrix
structure often have one "solid line" and other "dotted line" bosses. For
example, a salesperson might have one reporting line up to the head of sales
and a second reporting line to the regional manager. People work in
cross-functional teams by the very design of the matrix structure. Matrix
organizations bring with them their own set of challenges -- including, at
times, employees' receiving conflicting directions from multiple bosses, a lack
of single-point accountability for success or failure, and political infighting
over resources. But matrices provide compelling benefits too. They promote
collaborative working styles and enable business decisions that consider
multiple perspectives such as function, product, customer, and geography.

Lattice organizations foster these positive behaviors along horizontal
structures, bringing the best resources and information to bear on intersecting
issues and opportunities. For example, widely dispersed virtual teams -- often
with a variety of experts based in different global locations -- are delivering
strong results.

Fifty-four global teams studied in thirty-one companies, including Intel,
Textronic, and Royal Dutch/Shell, were found to be not only more productive but
also more innovative than face-to-face teams.

According to the study, "Far-flung global teams make decisions faster with more
input from others and develop policies that are implemented worldwide with
fewer problems than conventional teams meeting face-to-face often and
regularly." Teams find productive ways to communicate, partner together, and
tap in to the power of diversity.

Collaboration is an important enabler of dispersed ways of working. In addition
to capitalizing on the best qualities of matrix reporting structures and
far-flung team configurations, lattice organizations are going even further
along the path of job redesign.

Just as an easily reconfigurable production system is a success factor for mass
product customization, so too is the design of modularized jobs -- unbundling
activities that make up traditional jobs so that work can be allocated in a
greater variety of ways among team members, increasing opportunities for
efficiency, learning, and fit with life -- a key element of the lattice
organization.

Static, task-based job descriptions are being replaced with competency-based
descriptions to provide more adaptability in how work is divided up and
accomplished from one day to the next. Job modularization is also enabled by
team-based control and decision making about how projects get done and who is
responsible for which piece.

The film business is an example of a highly adaptable and fluid work structure.
The entire industry is project based, with teams composed of "diversely skilled
members who work for a limited period to create custom and complex products or
services."

One study showed that only 19 percent of people in the industry were employed
exclusively by one firm. The rest worked as subcontractors and had
"boundaryless careers." Team members decide among themselves how to accomplish
the tasks at hand, customizing the fit between work assignments and individual
abilities and circumstances. The needs of the business and the needs of the
individual are matched in real time.

The lattice organization rethinks who does what, with an eye toward
making movement across and within teams as seamless as possible. Given the
highly contextual nature of how and what work gets done, a company's task is to
provide teams with the tools needed to manage the right match between the
company's needs, the capabilities of team members, their career-life needs, and
the career-enhancing developmental opportunities that projects afford.

"Work units have to collectively make these decisions, and they have to make
them based both on the needs of the work and the needs of the employees,"
explains Lotte Bailyn, a professor at the MIT Sloan School of Management.

"It can't be done individually. It has to be done collectively by the people
who work interdependently. It needs to involve people in decisions about how to
get a product or service out productively and address the needs they have in
conjunction with achieving this result."

One example of the approach is physicians, who among the elite professions have
the highest proportion of people working fewer than thirty-five hours a week
beginning in their late thirties. Doctors' ability to work part-time later on
seems to be a payoff for the grueling hours of residency early in their
careers, and it appears to ease transitions between periods of working and not
working.

Economist Claudia Goldin and her colleagues at Harvard University found that
doctors move in and out of the labor force, interrupting their careers for a
year or more at a time, with far less financial penalty than in other
professions, such as financial services and law. Such career-life transitions
are possible because of a restructuring of the way work is done in many medical
specialties. Instead of going solo in individual practices, doctors are often
employed in group practices, which function as teams that jointly configure
their schedules to provide high levels of accessibility and quality care for
patients at a sustainable pace and workload for doctors.

In obstetrics, for instance, doctors in group practices take turns handling the
demanding times they need to be on call for births and sometimes rotate the
patients so that women get to know every doctor who might eventually deliver
their babies. Medical practices like these have, surprisingly for the nature of
the work, turned out to be models of group work and flexibility.

Redesigning jobs so that people can more readily move from one job to another
greatly enables career-life fit, but it also delivers on the career-enhancing
developmental opportunities people seek. A large-scale study of functional
flexibility -- conducted at thirty-six hundred Dutch companies employing more
than eleven thousand people in a variety of industries -- showed "a positive
relationship between functional flexibility and skills development," in large
part because people felt they had "greater autonomy in directing their skills,
involvement in decision-making, and access to training."

In another example, three health care organizations in the United Kingdom
changed their approach to staffing so that many of their people could step into
several different roles, depending on the need for workers at any point in
time. These organizations found that the arrangement created increased
opportunities for staff development -- a competitive advantage in a tight labor
market.

As market uncertainties rise, companies look for options to deploy their
people. By designing jobs with an eye toward development of transferable
skills, companies gain adaptability.

Rethinking work creates a nimble organization that can operate with efficiency
and effectiveness. In the case of Pitney Bowes, the work redesign led the
entire organization to be more customer-focused and ultimately more profitable
than before.

According to Amy Titus, a former BearingPoint consultant who was involved in
the Pitney Bowes transformation, the shift resulted in "everyone in the chain
adding more value, in part because they understood customer needs, and in part
because they were much more engaged in their work."

Wednesday, November 10, 2010

Private Banking Asia 2011

A whole new experience in 2011! Inspiring, refreshing, and stimulating.
Private Banking Asia 2011 is Asia's most established private banking and wealth
management conference that will focus on building new businesses and
capitalizing on innovations in Asia Pacific's wealth markets.
In 2011, we will focus on equipping you with the strategies, tools and
innovation in managing Asia's growing private wealth. Are you keen to help shape
the agenda forPrivate Banking Asia 2011? Please email your ideas / topic
suggestions to Eva Cheung at eva.cheung@terrapinn.com.

Thursday, November 4, 2010

Call for Applications: International Human Rights Exchange (South Africa) - Application Deadline: March 1, 2011

International Human Rights Exchange (IHRE)

The International Human Rights Exchange (IHRE) is the world's only
full-semester, multidisciplinary program in human rights. The program is housed
at the University of the Witwatersrand in Johannesburg, South Africa and is a
joint venture with Bard College.
Each year -- starting in July and ending in November -- students and faculty
from Africa and North America come together to participate in a deep and
multifaceted intellectual engagement in human rights. In addition to a required
core course, students choose from 12 or more electives exploring human rights
from the perspective of a variety of academic disciplines.
IHRE also opens up possibilities for substantive participation in human rights
work. Students enrolled in the Engagement with Human Rights course intern with
an NGO working on contemporary rights in post-apartheid South Africa.
Students also explore human rights challenges in rural South Africa through a
Community Human Rights Workshop, visit the Apartheid Museum and other relevant
sites, and attend guest lectures from human rights experts from South Africa and
around the world.
Students with a commitment to social justice and/or a history of academic or
personal involvement with human rights issues are particularly encouraged to
consider IHRE. The breadth and depth of the IHRE curriculum, combined with the
exposure to human rights issues seen from African perspectives and in the
context of South Africa's recent history, are especially valuable for students
preparing to embark on a career in social justice or human rights. However, we
encourage students of all backgrounds to apply. No previous study of human
rights is required.
Application Deadline = March 1, 2011

For more information on the International Human Rights Exchange:
http://www.ihre.org

Wednesday, November 3, 2010

Seven Secrets of an Emotional Intelligence Coach

by Dana C. Ackley | Chief Learning Officer

Many top leaders are asked to pay attention to their emotional intelligence
these days. To do so, they need a way to find out what it is and how they can
get more of it. That's where you come in.

Ever wonder why the smartest kids in class aren't always the most successful
later on? It's because intellect isn't enough. Many otherwise smart people lack
emotional intelligence (EQ), the skill set people need to access their own best
performance and to interact successfully with others.

Leaders need others to get things done. People who are low in EQ are often
their own worst enemy when it comes to getting things done through others and
are usually baffled by their lack of success. They sometimes feel that there is
an invisible barrier between them and their goals that they just can't seem to
understand or break through.

Many of these talented people have attained high positions due largely to their
intelligence and technical business skills. But they may rub people the wrong
way or bring people down with their lack of optimism. They may be impulsive or
inflexible. They may not be able to express clearly what they need from people
or be able to read what people need from them. People may not find them easy to
interact with, avoiding them as much as possible.

Consider your own executive team. Maybe you'll find a terrific CFO who doesn't
give his direct reports enough information to do their jobs and is too stern
looking to be approachable; or a vice president of marketing who gets less than
she might out of her people because she uses the same approach with everyone,
whether it fits or not; or a COO who avoids conflict and thus allows bad
performance to slide until he has to let someone go; or perhaps a CIO who
doesn't know how to negotiate win-win solutions when integrating IT solutions
into the company infrastructure.

While these people have proven themselves winners in many ways, their current
EQ deficits limit what they can contribute. At their level of achievement and
potential for influence, even a small improvement in EQ skills can have a huge
impact on their productivity and the productivity of their direct reports and
thus the company's bottom line. The higher up the ladder they are, the greater
the potential impact.

While there is little doubt that improving the EQ of top leaders can have a
huge effect on the organization, there is plenty of doubt about how to
implement an EQ program that actually works. If you are a CLO who has been
tasked with bringing EQ to your workplace, be afraid. Not because EQ is a bad
idea or because it doesn't work; on the contrary, an investment in EQ
development for your top leaders can yield huge returns. But the devil is in
the details, and it is very easy to make a mistake here. Many CLOs who have
tried EQ initiatives that failed will attest to that.

Seven secrets, had they been privy to them, would have saved them and made them
look like geniuses.

1. Prepare the ground.
Figure out what you want to gain; begin with the end in mind. For example,
Bronson Healthcare, a Baldrige Award-winning hospital system, wanted to prepare
its high-potential senior leaders to be ready to assume the roles of CEO and
COO. Its goal was to ensure that seven talented people were ready to guide the
organization.

Once you know what success will look like, create interest. Talk about the
benefits of increased EQ skills. Make sure people know that EQ training will be
a perk offered to those whom the organization has an enormous interest in
developing. If EQ training is "where they send the bad kids," no one will be
receptive.

Help participants get a base line. There are excellent assessment instruments
that executives can use to find out their EQ strengths and weaknesses. Do your
homework to find one that is based on solid scientific research. The instrument
should be standardized, normed and validated.

Several years ago, Capital One wanted its executives to learn more about their
own EQ profiles. A poorly constructed EQ test was selected on a pilot basis,
based largely on price because, had it been useful, it would have been given to
thousands of employees. The outcome of the pilot was described as "an organ
rejection." The executives rejected their results, not because they couldn't
handle negative feedback, but because the results were just plain wrong. The EQ
initiative suffered a near-fatal blow.

Consider two additional assessment elements. One is 360 EQ feedback combined
with the self-assessment to give a multidimensional picture. The other is an
assessment interview designed to identify the leader's individual goals. The
interview allows assessment results to be tied to participant and
organizational goals, resulting in intrinsic motivation for EQ development.

2. Make it voluntary.
Compulsory EQ training can be unpleasant for the unwilling. So it's up to
learning and development professionals to make the idea of developing EQ so
exciting and compelling that people will be eager to engage in it.

Does that sound like a tall order? It isn't, really. Enumerating the real
benefits - creating opportunities to let executives try out EQ tools on some of
the real-life leadership problems they face; linking increased EQ skills to
goals they already have; making sure they know the training is geared toward
the company's most valuable players; and, not surprisingly, making it voluntary
- almost always does the trick. For those who may worry that a voluntary
program lets some people off the hook, make sure everyone knows that while EQ
training is voluntary, performance is not. People can opt out of the help you
offer as long as they deliver the new higher standard through means of their
own.

3. Keep it private.
Executives who allow themselves to be assessed and developed place themselves
in a vulnerable position. They need to have their assessment and development
handled in a secure environment before they will fully commit.

This means that assessment results need to be strictly confidential - for the
individual's eyes only, not the manager's. This is a hard pill for some
companies to swallow. They're paying for the assessment and feel they have a
right to see the results. The problem is that if individuals know that their
managers will see the results, they may not be completely candid in answering
the assessment questions. The opportunity to get an accurate base line from
which to work is lost.

What the company really wants and needs is higher performance, not test
results. To keep the company in the loop, the development process should
include discussions between manager and executive as to what the executive will
work on as a result of the assessment and the rationale for doing so - how it
will benefit the organization. Whether the executive got a terrible score or
just an average score on an empathy test is not critical information.

For example, Waldner's Business Environments, an office furniture dealer in New
York, saw the potential for how improved EQ skills could elevate sales
performance. The organization planned an assessment program, expressing the
desire to view the resulting scores so it would know which employees to retain.
The EQ coach advised Waldner's that the program needed to be oriented around
either learning or selection, not both. The organization went back to its
original assessment goal and enjoyed enthusiastic engagement, even by some who
were initially reluctant.

4. Tackle meaningful issues.

Issues must be meaningful to both the executive and the organization. For
example, sometimes a boss goes to a workshop on empathy and loves it, and then
everybody has to go to empathy school. That is a bad idea, for the following
reasons:

a) Everybody may not need empathy training.
Providing empathy training to leaders already skilled in empathy is a waste of
time and money.

b) There is also an opportunity cost for those people.
Maybe they are good at empathy but not so good at impulse control. They get
upset and engage in relationship-damaging behaviors. They pay for those
outbursts with diminished productivity from those on the receiving end. Time
and money spent on empathy training can't then be spent on what they really
need, the development of impulse control skills.

Learning to change lifelong emotional habits can be done, but it is hard work.
There has to be some intrinsic value and motivation for people to keep plugging
away at it. Linking learning to individual goals is a great way to provide that
motivation.

For example, say a given individual was already a star on the CEO track, but
she sensed a problem. She got results, but burned bridges by doing so. She
asked for help learning how to read others and manage her impulses as she
responded to difficulties. Upping her game on these skills led to a major
promotion.

Well-done EQ assessments lay the groundwork for such transformations. In
addition to such assessments, each high potential should attend a planning
meeting where he or she gets help matching individual goals with specific EQ
skills, prioritizing which ones to work on and creating an individualized plan
that accounts for all factors required for sustainable behavior change.

5. Provide the right learning tools.
Changing deeply ingrained behavior is tricky business. Just telling someone who
isn't assertive to be more assertive isn't helpful. What you can do is give
them the tools needed to make it happen.

One tool is access to expertise in behavior change, perhaps through an EQ
coach. To get top results, use experienced coaches - experts in behavior
change. Such expertise is useful in providing your leaders with guided practice
in EQ skills in the real world and feedback and support when the going gets
rough. Experienced coaches will know how to respond to setbacks and ask
challenging but motivating questions - and do all of this without creating
dependency or discouragement.

Other tools might include information about key EQ skills - what they mean;
what impact they have on leadership abilities; and which ones, if they're
lacking, can derail a career. Intellectual knowledge alone won't give a person
EQ, but it's a good tool in the quest. Finally, there are structured ways to
create EQ-smart strategies for tasks such as leading a high-stakes meeting to
get needed results. Goals, logs and timelines are helpful for charting
developmental progress and keeping it on track. There are practical exercises
that can be designed for developing specific EQ skills in the workplace.

Meaningful change is hard. Two things can make it easier. One is strong
organizational support. If most peers are participating, they tend to support
each other. The other is recognizing that while everyone has developmental
opportunities when it comes to EQ, everybody also has strengths. These
strengths can be used to help build needed skills. A good coach, in concert
with a good assessment instrument, can help participants discover and leverage
theirs.

For example, say a given individual was a talented CEO, especially skilled in
the art of relationships. But he couldn't get his executive team to do what he
needed them to do. Assessment showed that his key EQ weakness was
assertiveness. His team didn't know what he wanted them to do because he wasn't
sufficiently clear. His coaching utilized exercises, insights, feedback and
support, all focused on building assertiveness in his real world. The fact that
people liked him helped them respond positively to his initially clumsy
efforts. Over time, he became quite skilled and got the responses from his team
that he wanted.

6. Change thoughts and feelings, not just behavior.
Ironically, behavior change programs that focus only on behavior usually fail.
Change efforts must include attention to the building blocks of behavior - the
way we think about a situation and our emotional response to it. Emotions,
thoughts and behaviors are interdependent. To get a change in one, you have to
change the others.

Leaders who believe that people are fundamentally lazy are likely to feel
annoyed with them, which will come out in their behavior - the way they look,
speak and respond to them. Alternatively, leaders who believe that people are
fundamentally motivated to perform will probably feel positively toward them.
That positive feeling will come out in their behavior through encouragement,
recognition and respect. Helping the first group of leaders to change their
beliefs about people may lead to a change in behavior, which in turn may elicit
different results from followers. Other times, starting by tapping into a
different emotion is what is needed. Programs that provide access to all three
possibilities triple their effectiveness.

For example, some years ago, a Kroger grocery store had long-standing poor
customer service. Behavior change programs failed to achieve sustainable
results. What did work was creating a new emotional atmosphere, accomplished in
part by resolving long-standing conflicts among key individuals. Other chronic
complaints among employees were addressed, creating a new belief that
management cared about employee welfare. That new belief translated into
sustainable employee behavior geared toward caring about customers, resulting
in a highly significant benefit to the store's bottom line.

7. Give it time.
The behavior of the leaders of your organization evolved in the same way that
yours has. You have been learning how to relate to the world since the day you
were born. You asked for things before you even had the words to do so, and you
sensed how people responded to you. That became your truth and shaped your
subsequent behavior accordingly. Every time you interacted with people, your
belief in this truth intensified. Your behaviors and responses became more and
more automatic for you, based on beliefs that, over time, became assumptions.

Assumptions inhabit the nonverbal part of the brain, making access
difficult. But now that you have grown up, your world has changed. Those
assumptions might not be working as well as they once did. But they still guide
your behavior. They are the "invisible barrier" that can limit effectiveness
and achievement.

To gain self-mastery, people have to unmask these hidden barriers and replace
them with a different source of control - new guidelines and beliefs that
better fit the world they now inhabit.

Leaders must uncover these hidden assumptions, envision the way they want to be
and exercise the new thoughts and behaviors over and over until they've
actually rewired the synapses in the brain. Then those new behaviors become
default responses - based on new and better assumptions that guide behavior and
create higher achievement.

For example, say a given individual was the CIO of a company and the smartest
person in the room, no matter what room he walked into. He was fired for the
way he treated people. He wisely used it as a wake-up call. He and his coach
identified the hidden assumptions that allowed him to behave badly toward
people. Once he understood them, they lost much of their power. They lost the
rest of their power when he practiced - over and over - the behaviors that he
admired in others.

EQ development can pay big dividends. But like anything with a potential
major payoff, the right kind of investment is required. Your systematic
approach to EQ development, using these seven secrets, will make the difference
in whether your investment will bloom or fade.

Tuesday, November 2, 2010

Managing Eggshell Situations

by R. Roosevelt Thomas Jr. | Human Resource Executive Online

The management of such situations is not conflict management, but rather
decision-making in the midst of tensions -- before they evolve into conflict --
in pursuit of organizational and/or personal objectives. The goal is to make
effective decisions in spite of the tensions -- this is the essence of managing
diversity.

Eggshell situations are those characterized by intense diversity tension. If
one defines diversity as the differences and similarities that can characterize
a mixture like the workforce, and further stipulates that tension to some
degree comes with diversity, then the management of eggshell situations becomes
part and parcel of managing diversity.

In the workforce and the workplace, for example, eggshell situations could
involve labor/management relations, exchanges between members of different
races or different functions, interactions between employees working in
different countries, negotiations between representatives of the acquiring
company and the enterprise being acquired, and/or relations between male and
female employees.

In each of these situations, circumstances can be akin to that of walking over
a bunch of eggs: One misstep and you can have a serious mess.

The management of such situations is not conflict management, but rather
decision-making in the midst of tensions -- before they evolve into conflict --
in pursuit of organizational and/or personal objectives. The goal is to make
effective decisions in spite of the tensions: This is the essence of managing
diversity.

That this is not easily done is reflected in the tales of two high profile
eggshell situations that of Harvard Professor Henry Louis Gates and Cambridge,
Mass., Police Officer James Crowley, and that of former U.S. Department of
Agriculture official Shirley Sherrod and a white farmer.

In the first, Officer Crowley confronted Gates as he struggled to open his
stuck door. As the officer sought to confirm the professor's identity and right
to be where he was, their exchange escalated into a racially charged situation
that received national attention.

In Sherrod's episode, a white farmer approached and asked Sherrod for
assistance in avoiding foreclosure on his farm. At the time served, Sherrod was
a head of an agency set up to aid black farmers.

In a now-well-known speech, Sherrod said she perceived the white applicant as
"attempting to show ... he was superior to me," and that she, therefore,
hesitated to provide assistance. Despite this initial tension and her
reluctance, she did successfully help the farmer and, according to him, went
out of her way to aid him.

Are there any lessons from these incidents that might help us deal with
tension-charged eggshell situations? Below, I offer four:

Lesson 1: Learn to recognize an eggshell situation and its implications.
You might ask, "How can you miss such situations, give the tensions that come
with them?"

Sometimes, the task is not so much simply to recognize, but also to appreciate
the requirements of the eggshell situation in question.

That is, once you recognize you are in the midst of such a circumstance, you
need to proceed quickly and cautiously to diagnostic mode: Why is this an
eggshell situation? What do I need to be aware of as I continue? Are there any
especially challenging aspects for which I need to prepare?

This is analogous to realizing you have cruised into a speed trap. Once you
have this realization, you quickly ask: What is the speed limit? Was I
speeding? Are there any police around? Where are the police likely to station
themselves? For how long do I have to be careful about my speed?

The answers to these questions will allow you to develop an effective strategy
for moving through the speed trap without penalty.

Lesson 2: Examine your motives.
Explore what you are feeling. As Sherrod faced the farmer seeking aid, and
realized that she was in an eggshell situation, she mentally examined her
motives and feelings.

She probably debated whether she should pay him back for a series of racial
transgressions: the alleged shooting of her father by a white neighbor, the
reportedly racist rejection of her and her husband's petition to the USDA for
financial aid to save their farm, or simply all the white-on-black racism she
had seen in her life.

She perhaps wondered why she should, as head of a nonprofit organization set up
to help black farmers, help this white individual -- he was not her
responsibility.

She probably thought about the commitment she had made to bring about change
and make a difference. She also likely thought about her mother's dictum: "If
we had tried to live with hate in our hearts, we'd probably be dead by now."

And finally, she apparently grappled with "What would God have me to do?"

The white farmer probably also examined his motives and feelings: "Isn't this
something? I am reduced to asking a black woman for help."

"Should I try to intimidate her and remind her that after all, I am white?"
"Or, should I go in with humility and utmost respect -- even if it's not real?"
"Can I count on receiving a fair hearing from a black woman?"

Lesson 3: Identify the requirement.
This is not always easy. Preferences (what I would like to do), conveniences
(what I find easy to do), and traditions (what I have always done) -- these
elements sometimes come disguised as requirements. But once requirements are
identified and prioritized, it's easier to determine what actions must be
taken.

Often the first step toward clarity about requirements is to identify an
overarching objective. Sherrod apparently concluded that doing God's will was
her paramount life objective, as opposed to exacting revenge for racial wrongs,
narrowly following the requirements of her job or even challenging traditions
and making a difference.

Accordingly, she reports that, as she dealt with the farmer, God helped her
understand that the requirement was to assist poor folks regardless of their
race or color. I should be clear that others in this situation might have
identified a different priority requirement that might have led to a different
conclusion.

For the white farmer, the overarching motivation was straightforward. Avoid
foreclosure. It was not preserving traditions, maintaining the supremacy of
whites or carrying out a hateful agenda. He desperately wanted to save his
farm.

As one might expect, in situations characterized by tensions, controlling your
emotions can be a key facilitator of examining your motives and identifying the
requirement as Sherrod and the farmer did.

Looking back at the Gates/Crowley encounter and wondering why their
interactions escalated into national conflict, a friend of mine opined that the
causal factor was testosterone more than racial profiling.

Stated differently, he was arguing that testosterone-driven emotions had
prohibited both of these individuals from using their individual and collective
wisdom about historical encounters between black men and white policemen.

Gates possessed enormous knowledge about blacks and the challenges of
discrimination; reportedly, he even had experienced a similar situation in
another city.

Crowley, on the other hand, had provided training on avoiding racial profiling
to his colleagues on the Cambridge, Mass., police force. Yet, they both cruised
into a speed trap (eggshell situation), without even recognizing where they
were, and acted as if they were neophytes.

Apparently, emotions of the moment clouded their individual and collective
judgments. Implicit in Lessons No. 2 and No. 3 is the admonishment that
effective management of eggshell situations requires management of emotions.
That two knowledgeable and competent professionals such as Gates and Crowley
can be vulnerable to the heat of the moment suggests just how difficult
controlling emotions can be for all of us.

Lesson 4: Allow yourself to be driven by the requirement.
We all know how attractive it can be to do what we like, find easy or have
always done. In an organization established to help black farmers, in a
racially divided community, and in the midst of a history of racial pain and
hatred, neither conveniences, preferences nor traditions called for Sherrod to
serve the white farmer.

It required courage, effort and intention to move beyond racial considerations
and to focus on meeting what was "the requirement" was for her.

The four lessons implicit in Sherrod's rising above racial bias can be
generalized into guidelines for dealing with any kind of eggshell situation.
What, then, are the implications for human resource and diversity practitioners
seeking to foster effective management of diversity?

Because eggshell situations are at the core of diversity and diversity
management, the individual's ability to make quality decisions in the midst of
these circumstances becomes the cornerstone of an organization's efforts to
build diversity-management capability. Leaders and executives must, therefore,
equip individual contributors at all levels of the organization with the
concepts, principles and frameworks needed for effective decision-making in the
midst of eggshell situations. This necessity is often missed.

The tendency frequently is to focus on addressing organizational variables such
as culture, policies and systems that can enhance the management of diversity.
This emphasis is good and necessary.

But equally required is empowering individual participants to make quality
decisions in the midst of diversity. Here, individual and organizational
considerations reinforce each other: Organizational variables provide context
for individual effectiveness with diversity, while individual capability makes
real and sustainable organizational progress with diversity possible.

By far, for human resource and diversity practitioners, the need to foster
diversity-management capability at both the organizational and individual
levels is the key implication from these incidents.

Monday, November 1, 2010

New Information in the Diary Submission Received

You received a New Information in the Diary submission from Community Network:
 

  • Subject: Regional Forum: Impact of the Global Crisis on Asia, Lessons Learned, Policy Insights and Outlook
  • Description:

    ADB Headquarters, Manila, Philippines: 4 November 2010 Objectives | Expected Outputs | Target Participants | Resource Speakers Objectives At the end of this Forum, participants will have: * Assessed the robustness of recovery and effectiveness of policies to ensure a soft landing * Discussed how to enhance resilience, sustainability and inclusive growth Top Expected Outputs The tangible outputs produced will be: * Enhanced understanding of lessons learned from the crisis * Insights shared on the effectiveness of policies to ensure a robust recovery and sustainable and inclusive growth * Update on the economic outlook Top Target Participants Ministers, Ministry of Finance; Governors of Central Banks. View the list of participants [ PDF ]. Top Resource Speakers * Edwin M. Truman, Senior Fellow, Peterson Institute for International Economics * Jack Boorman, Senior Associate, Centennial Group * Sudipto Mundle, Member, National Statistical Commission, Government of India/National Institute of Public Finance and Policy, India

  • Full Name: Kanakalingam Sasikumar
  • Email Address: saksi76@gmail.com



-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You received this form submission from your site powered by Yola.com.
If you need help with your form, please contact customer support.